Monday, August 17, 2026
Janet’s Breasts
Shirking these, our given norms of
a both polite and restrained society,
it remains to be said that, yes,
Janet had breasts.
‘Breasts’ being the adjacent
sensuous synonym to that of the ever
wholesome and homogenized
mammary gland in situ pluralistic.
This, a term of which men are genetically
disinclined to udder, er,
utter, er, articulate.
Oh, and how did I know
that Janet had breasts?
Well, on February 1st, there
in the year of our Lord 2004,
one Justin Timberlake ripped away at
a certain Janet Jackson’s bodice to
there expose exactly one bare breast
with an equally singular pierced nipple.
And this…
This
was most certainly not that
of any mere mammalian
mammary madonna!
No.
Oh…
Uh oh.
For what was this if not a national outrage?
Janet and Justin in said udder adulteration.
They of untethered titillation.
They toot-root in cahoot.
Just one single breast,
here in jest, transgressed, and this…
This our once prissily puritan nation
wouldst ever now never be the same.
Yet I herewith submit that
though one half of Janet’s virtue
had been wantonly debauched,
the other breast remained as yet un-ravaged,
And thus such bust absent lust,
would exist ever autonomous,
free of lewd and lascivious conquest.
No matter such blather,
for in the eyes of the world,
what had become of America
but udder depravity?
What with its torrid taint
o’ titillated turpitude.
This, our United States o’ Sodom;
aghast and alas,
now a Go-Go Gomorrah.
Lo but two years later,
the US military decides to
once again send me to the
Sanctified State of Saudi Arabia.
And this time…
This time, the flight is commercial;
This time, I pass through an airport terminal;
This time, I pass a magazine kiosk and
there pick up some cultural elucidation.
And here you unduly presume
I in some sordid solicit search of
that one Mister Hefner’s
much renowned magazine o’
mammary masticate elation.
Au contraire mon frère.
Just such seen uber-boobed ‘zine
is not in actuality about the
quality of its discerning literature.
Indeed, the US Military officially advised us
that just such a titular rag is to be considered
alas…. pornography.
Oh, and the Nation of Islam,
aka, Saudi Arabia,
absolutely will not permit the import
of a woman’s bare breasts.
So okay.
Duly noted.
No Playboy.
Sure. Sure.
But howza ‘bout a music magazine?
No sex;
No drugs;
but some Rock n’
Rolling Stone.
Upon arrival in Riyadh,
the Saudi Arabian Mutawa,
aka, religious police
are there to perform an act of
moral custom inspection.
The presumed inference being that
Americans as a whole are
inherently corrupt of mind and
possessed of such craven desire
as to be unholy wholly decadent.
And okay…
As this professed inquisition
makes its way down the
long line of suitcases
in search of innate
American depravity,
I can certainly see how all those
other military member’s members
might now amass alas
emasculated.
And I? I?
What am I if not in manner
mostly immaculate?
There in 2006, that
September issue of The Rolling Stone
featured Janet Jackson on its cover.
Both Janet and her
husband’s wanton hands.
Oh, and in a million years,
I bet you’ll never guess what those
scurrilous hands were doing.
Lo, but in a second, some multitude
of other Saudi Mutawa
surge to surround both I and
he who holds Janet’s breasts to my face.
And yet a moment later,
we are joined by a couple of
aghast American officers with
disgust-doped demeanors
upon their rankled faces.
Oh, and I? Oh I… I?
Dumb-foundedly found dumb.
I now surly cowed, what
with neutered nipple dummy,
yum yum,
made udderly mum
of mouth.
c 2026 Jack David Hubbell























